By A. Lianou
In the second session of the AFET’s committee discussions a variety of subjects were brought to the table such as the energy policy between EU and Russia, in this topic all participants analyzed their positions.
More specifically EPP emphasized on the need of EU to become energetically independent as the current regime of its dependence from Russia in the energy field and especially gas and oil, has given Russia the leverage to apply pressure to the EU. Additionally, ECR suggested a few courses of action in order for EU to gain its independency such as further scientific research on the domain of energy sources and the exploitation of such discoveries (par example bio-gas), secondly they defended the usage of latest renewable energy resources like nuclear energy without ignoring the traditional ones.
Moreover, S&D proposed a shift from the traditional EU’s energy suppliers to external countries such as Africa or Norway for gas and oil in order for EU to create new collaborations and further expand while diminishing the Russian influence.
A different position coming from ALDE cited the foundation of a European energy union as a form of better management and energy distribution among EU’s members ,they also referred to the possibility of creating ‘’energy banks’’ as a precocious measure for preventing the repetition of 2006-2007 energy crisis.
Lastly, GUE/NGL remained reluctant as far as a European energy union should be operating, indicating that energy is a public good therefore needs to be free and easily accessible by everyone, although they also mentioned the necessity to reinforce renewable resources of energy.
The discussion concerning the diplomatic measures and economic sanctions that are imposed to Russia by the EU was halted by the Commisioner who stated that it is a now closed subject wher the parliament’s members have no jurisdiction.
